|
|
|
|
|
|
Sidewalk Master Plan Column Headings Legend
-
Ranking:
Proposed segment's draft B/C ratio ranking against all other
candidate segments.
-
Seg ID:
Segment Identification Number (as displayed on prioritization maps
in lieu of road names, due to map size limitations).
-
Existing Lanes:
Number of through travel lanes on the segment - denoted by "#" and
roadway type such as undivided, divided, one-way etc. - denoted
by "Type".
-
Posted Spd (mph):
Posted speed limit on the segment.
-
Width of Pavement:
-
Wt:
Width of outside lane, measured from the outside lane stripe to the edge
of pavement (including shoulder, if any)
-
Wi:
Width of unpaved shoulder, if any
-
Wps:
Width of paved shoulder, if any
-
% OPS:
Percent of segment with on-street parking
-
Cross Section (C/S):
Roadway cross-section type, whether Urban or Rural (i.e., curb and
gutter or ditch/swale system, respectively).
-
% with Sidewalk:
Directional sidewalk coverage along each segment.
-
Sidewalk Width:
Width of any existing sidewalk along each segment.
-
Right-of-way Width (R/W) (ft):
Estimated width of right-of-way along each segment.
-
R-side Profile Cond. (1-3):
Type of existing profile condition along the side of the road,
i.e., flat shoulder, swale, or ditch.
-
Pedestrian LOS:
These columns depict the numerical, calculated pedestrian level of
service (LOS) value and corresponding LOS grade for the segment's
existing walking conditions.
-
Delta RPC w/ LOS "B":
The absolute difference in the Roadside Pedestrian Conditions (RPC)
between the existing Pedestrian LOS value and the adopted
Pedestrian LOS value (in this case 2.5 for "B").
-
Delta RPC:
100% Scale: Shows the delta (difference) in Roadside Pedestrian
Conditions (RPC) converted to a 100% scale; all benefit-side
criteria have been converted to a 100% scale for equivalent
comparison purposes.
-
School Demand Results:
100% Scale: Depicts the potential trip activity for area schools on
a 100% scale.
-
Public Votes:
100% Scale: Illustrates the number of times the particular road
segment was "voted" on by residents either in the first round of
public workshops or via the "Unfunded Sidewalk Request List".
-
% of Sidewalk Needed:
The percentage of sidewalk needed to complete at least one side of
the segment with sidewalks, end to end.
-
Length (mi):
Length of the segment in miles.
-
Recommended Facility Type:
Denotes description of the facility type selected for the segment;
following is the definition of the six facility types:
-
A1 - At grade concrete sidewalk, no R-O-W required
-
A2 - At grade concrete sidewalk, R-O-W required
-
B1 - Concrete sidewalk with slope adjustment, no R-O-W required
-
B2 - Concrete sidewalk with slope adjustment, R-O-W required
-
C1 - Concrete sidewalk with enclosed ditch, no R-O-W required
-
C2 - Concrete sidewalk with enclosed ditch, R-O-W required
-
Facility Type Unit Cost:
The unit cost (per mile) associated with the facility type.
-
Segment Benefit Level:
The benefit level associated with construction of a sidewalk along
the particular segment; benefit is calculated by:
(0.4 x Delta RPC)+(0.5 x School Demand)+(0.1 x Public Votes)
-
Segment Improvement Cost:
Estimated cost to construct individual segments.
-
Cumulative Improvement Cost:
Running total of estimated segments costs based on draft ranking.
-
Segment B/C Ratio:
Shows the benefit-to-cost ratio based on the calculated facility
cost and the benefit level information reported in the previous
columns; it is calculated by:
(0.4 x Delta RPC)+(0.5 x School Demand)+(0.1 x Public Votes) Cost
|
|
